Dani Laidley, the previous AFL coach who was outed in public as transgender after susceptible photographs of her in custody had been allegedly leaked, is suing Victoria Police.

Ms Laidley, 54, has launched authorized motion in Victoria’s Supreme Court docket, claiming the pressure is chargeable for the alleged actions of three cops who’re accused of sharing delicate photographs of her which shortly made their approach into the general public realm.

The pictures of Ms Laidley, who was previously generally known as Dean, had been splashed throughout the tabloid press in Could final 12 months.

Within the first mugshot, the 54-year-old was pictured sporting make-up, whereas the second exhibits her sporting a protracted blonde wig with a Victoria Police officer within the foreground.

Unspecified damages being sought in courtroom case

Court docket paperwork filed on Monday accused one detective of publishing the primary {photograph} of Ms Laidley to a WhatsApp group known as “SD1 Gentleman’s Membership”, which had 9 members.

The identical detective is accused of sending the picture to different officers, allegedly saying Ms Laidley was “dressing like a tranny” and calling her a “full-blown tranny”.

One other police officer, who’s a senior constable, allegedly revealed the second {photograph} to the identical WhatsApp group.

“The character of the primary and second images and the phrases communicated by cops of and in regards to the plaintiff had been corresponding to to ask and expose the plaintiff to humiliation and mock,” Ms Laidley’s legal professionals alleged within the courtroom paperwork.

“The primary and second images and the phrases communicated by cops … had been understood to imply that the plaintiff, by cause of dressing as and/or figuring out as a girl, was deserving of disparagement and mock and that she was a ridiculous spectacle.”

Ms Laidley’s legal professionals claimed that whereas she was in custody, she was below the care of Victoria Police and that the pressure breached its obligation of care to her.

They’re accusing Victoria Police of being chargeable for the “republications” of the photographs, claiming that the officers accused ought to have recognized the delicate footage would have been “disseminated on social media and by media retailers”.

“Because of the issues set out above, the plaintiff has been injured in her emotions, credit score, and popularity, has been introduced into public ridicule and contempt and has suffered and continues to undergo damage, loss, and injury,” courtroom paperwork alleged.

Ms Laidley is searching for unspecified damages.

Ms Laidley’s lawyer, Jeremy King, declined a request for remark.

Victoria Police has been contacted for remark.


  • Copy hyperlink
  • Fb
  • Twitter
Extra on:
  • Melbourne
  • Courts and Trials
  • Australian Soccer League

Source link


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *